Log in

LiveJournal FOAF

Oct. 6th, 2008

09:44 pm - Stipid Question

How can I use a SPARQL with LJ FOAF, e.g. if I want to get 500 last registered users. Can Somebody help me?

Mar. 30th, 2006

01:51 pm - ICBM/based_near



Set your ICBM via http://community.livejournal.com/lj_nifty/141762.html and it will eventually show up in your FOAF file when the next code rollout goes through.

Feb. 17th, 2005

08:44 pm - FOAF Update Patch

Since I now have someone to pass the torch onto for the time being, I took the time to put together a decent patch for LiveJournal's FOAF output. There are a number of distinct aspects to improving LiveJournal's FOAF output: in this patch, I include all of them. This entry includes an annotated version of the patch, and what I'm changing, and why.

The patch can be found at http://crschmidt.net/lj/foaf.patch.txt .

LJ::load_user_props($u, qw{
- aolim icq yahoo jabber msn url urlname external_foaf_url
+ aolim icq yahoo jabber msn url urlname external_foaf_url state city country journaltitle

Here, you can see that I am adding three user props for loading: state, city, country, and journaltitle. These will all be used, if available, later in the FOAF file.

- $ret .= " xml:lang=\"en\"\n";

Pulling out the xml:lang="en", becuase it really isn't serving the purpose it should. Although there is *some* text in the document which is in the English language, much of it is going to be nicknames or other fields which are not language specific, and tagging these as English turned out to be a bad idea. In addition, sha1sums were also being tagged as english, which means that in some cases, they aren't seen as "equal" due to language differences.

The next chunk looks a bit funky, but I'm not about to hack diff to make it look better, so I'll just explain: The birthdate and Group/Person code is moving down a bit. The first part of the file will now be a "PersonalProfileDocument". This allows spiders of the document to know who the main "person" the file is about is, without needing LiveJournal specific knowledge. To that end, I've also added an rdf:nodeID='a', to link from the profile document to the <foaf:Person> who is the maker/center of the document. The reason that the nickname and birthdate are moving down is that they were earlier displayed, even if the user had an external FOAF URL, which is not acceptable: with an external FOAF URL, as much data as possible should be left out.

The next chunk:

- # include a user's journal page and web site info
- $ret .= " <foaf:weblog rdf:resource=\"" . LJ::journal_base($u) . "/\"/>\n";
+ # include a user's journal page, name/nick and web site info
+ $ret .= " <foaf:name>LJ::exml($u->{name})</foaf:name>\n" if $u->{name};
+ $ret .= " <foaf:nick>$u->{user}</foaf:nick>\n";
+ $ret .= " <foaf:logo rdf:resource='$LJ::USERPIC_ROOT/$u->{defaultpicid}/$u->{userid}' />\n" if ($u->{defaultpicid});
+ $ret .= " <foaf:weblog rdf:resource='" . LJ::journal_base($u) . "/'";
+ $ret .= " dc:title=\"" . LJ::exml($u->{journaltitle}) . "\"" if $u->{journaltitle};
+ $ret .= "/>\n";

is probably the most controversial change of the bunch. There are three things happening here:

  1. foaf:name is added, set to the "Name" field stored for the user
  2. default userpic is added, as a foaf:logo. This was a *lot* of discussion in the foaf community, and it was decided that this was the closest thing that there was to a foaf-specific tag.
  3. journaltitle, if it is available, is added to the weblog node.

The next two chunks are well laid out and self explanatory: one is a a reformatting of the foaf:dateOfBirth (Which has been redefined to not be what LiveJournal uses) into a bio:birth Event with a date. Secondly, the location information is included as a vcard:ADR, the most accurate way of describing said information at the moment.

If anyone has any thoughts on things I've missed, or would like me to explain my reasoning more for a specific choice, please feel free to ask, and I will do my best to answer.

http://crschmidt.net/lj/foaf.patched.xml is an example of the output from the new code, although it is not fully representative, as i have neither a birthdate nor location set.

Edited: Mutiny, on #foaf on irc.freenode.net, mentions that I wasn't properly escaping the $u->{name} field. This isn't needed for $u->{nick}, since it can't have any goofy characters, but name certainly can.

Dec. 30th, 2004

04:56 pm

This is similar to the question that was asked asked, but is there a way to add a see also statement to our lj foaf files? If not, I would like to suggest this fuctionality.

Dec. 29th, 2004

05:11 pm - FOAF Merging?

Sorry. I'm new to this user group so I'm sure this question has been ask many times before, but is there a simple way or an application that will take multiple FOAF files (say, from LJ and Tribe.net) and merge them into one?

Dec. 24th, 2004

03:51 pm - Importing FOAF data


I'm curious, is there now or is there planned to be a way for LiveJournal to import FOAF data? The Manage User Info screen lets you input a FOAF URL, but the explanatory text there says merely that requests for the built-in FOAF URL on LiveJournal will redirect to that URL if it is provided. I imagine that certain information, such as the "knows" data, would have to be ignored, but other things, like the user's interests, bio, and homepage, could be updated.

Sep. 5th, 2004

08:18 pm - LJ Visualization

Not sure how many people are interested to see applications of the lj foaf data, but here's a project of mine in case anyone's interested: a LiveJournal social network browser. The basic idea is that you load one user's extended network (a VERY slow process the first time), and then you click and hover around exploring the interconnections amongst both friend relationships and interest matches. I'd love to hear any feedback or questions.

Jul. 20th, 2004

10:13 am

Hello everyone, I have a very simple question - how to(using what) calculate a hash of my e-mail address?

Jun. 3rd, 2004

10:39 pm - FOAF-trolls

This entire concept of FOAF seems very intresting and promising, but I do have to ask, it also is based on the conept that a web users FOAF file would be correct, yes? There's nothing preventing someone from creating a FOAF file that isn't a real reflection of themselves.

Do you think these "FOAF-trolls" may prove to be a problem, or just something we'll have to live with?

Current Mood: curiouscurious

May. 9th, 2004

02:07 pm - Other sources of FOAF?

Last night I wrote an Objective C parser for FOAF, based on LJ's FOAF feeds. Does anyone know other sites that publish FOAF so that I can test my code with general feeds?

Example app screenshot behind the cutCollapse )

Navigate: (Previous 10 Entries)